Product Liability · Consumer Products · Automotive · Industrial

Product Liability Expert Witnesses for Defective Plastic Products

When a person is injured by a plastic product or part that breaks, it is important to hire a plastic expert to determine the cause. Our experts utilize CT scanning, computer modeling, and detailed material analysis to prove exactly how and why a product failed.

15
+

Plastic Resins Analyzed

200
+

Legal Cases Retained

38

States

30
+

Years Experience

Why Attorneys Choose Us

Specialized plastic expertise that wins product liability cases.

peg_icon_13
Ph.D.-Level Credentials

Most of our experts not only have a Ph.D., but also decades of experience working for large plastic manufacturers. This combination of academic rigor and industry knowledge is rare and invaluable in product liability litigation.

 peg_icon_1-1 
Daubert-Proof Methodology

An expert must have experience with the specific type of plastic in your case. Our plastic experts have experience working with all common plastics — PC, PP, PE, PS, ABS, PVC, nylons, acrylics, epoxys, and more.

 peg_icon_18 
CT-First Forensic Approach

The first thing we do is perform a high resolution CT scan — non-destructive and generally reveals manufacturing and design defects. We follow up with forensic analysis and computer modeling to show exactly what caused the product to fail.

 peg_icon_19 
Authoritative Testimony

When asked a 'yes' or 'no' question on the witness stand, if the answer is yes, our experts are not wishy-washy and will answer 'absolutely!' This confidence comes from decades of hands-on experience with plastic products.

Engineering & Design Services

Five core capabilities — from simulation to production-floor optimization.

Consumer Product Failure Analysis

Step stools, chairs, toys, exercise equipment, water filters, toilet components, electronics, and everyday household products. When a consumer product made of plastic breaks and injures someone, the first thing we do is perform a high resolution CT scan.

  • CT scanning reveals internal voids, knit lines, incipient cracks, and contamination invisible from outside

  • Computer modeling of product design and the molding process proves failure causation

  • SEM fractography identifies crack initiation site and fracture mechanism

  • Chemical analysis detects contaminated or recycled plastic in molded parts

  • Finite Element Analysis (FEA) proves whether a part was defectively designed and is unable to distribute stresses or concentrates them

CT scan cross-section of cracked plastic cap revealing internal defects in consumer product liability case

Automotive Plastic Component Failures

Plastic is replacing metal in vehicles to reduce weight and improve fuel efficiency. Under-hood components are exposed to extreme heat, motor oils, brake fluid, ethanol-containing fuel, and other aggressive chemicals.

  • Under-hood chemical and heat exposure causing embrittlement and cracking

  • Fuel system component degradation from ethanol-containing gasoline
    Intake manifold and coolant reservoir failures from long-term heat aging

  • Interior trim and safety-critical component fractures

  • Differentiation between manufacturing defect and normal service degradation

Automotive headrest foam material exposed during product liability failure analysis inspection

Industrial Plastic Product Failures

Industrial and commercial plastic products must withstand demanding service conditions. Computer modeling and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) can prove whether the wrong material was selected for the application.

  • FEA proves wrong material selection for service requirements

  • We can also do dynamic FEA to estimate the fatigue life of a plastic part design

  • ASTM chemical compatibility testing for industrial chemical environments

  • Piping, tank, and valve failures from chemical incompatibility

  • Structural component failures under sustained load (creep)

  • Manufacturing quality control deficiencies in industrial-grade parts

FEA von Mises stress analysis heat map on industrial component for product liability investigation

Medical Device Plastic Failures

Medical devices made from plastic must meet stringent biocompatibility and performance requirements. Sterilization processes can degrade polymer properties over time.

  • Sterilization-induced polymer degradation (gamma, EtO, autoclave)

  • Biocompatibility and material selection failures

  • Surgical instrument and implant component fractures

  • Packaging integrity failures compromising sterile barrier

  • We can determine if a failure was caused by misuse

Surgeon performing procedure with medical device relevant to product liability failure investigation

Root Causes We Investigate

Every plastic product failure falls into one of three categories — and our forensic methodology identifies which one.

peg_icon_20
Design Defects

Wrong material selection, inadequate stress analysis, and failure to account for service conditions. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) computer models stress distribution throughout a plastic part to determine whether the design evenly distributes loads or concentrates them at weak points.

peg_icon_14
Manufacturing Defects

CT scans reveal voids near surfaces where cracks initiate, incompletely fused knit lines, and other internal defects invisible from outside. Contaminated resin is a serious issue: in one case, a folding step stool made in China contained foreign PVC particles embedded in what should have been pure polypropylene (PP).

peg_icon_3
Material Selection Failures

SEM reveals the fracture mode — environmental stress cracking (ESC), tensile overload, fatigue, creep, or high-speed impact — each of which leaves distinctive 'tell-tale marks' on the fracture surface traceable to the crack origin.

Information Gain

The CT Scan Advantage

The first thing we do when we receive a failed plastic product is to perform a high resolution CT scan. The CT scan is non-destructive and clearly reveals manufacturing defects and design defects in plastic parts.

We generally follow up with computer modeling of the product design and the molding process to show exactly what caused the product to fail.

"CT images and computer models visibly prove how and why the product failed — evidence far more persuasive than a 50-page expert report."

Unlike destructive testing methods, CT scanning preserves the failed part in its original condition, maintaining chain of custody integrity for litigation.

CT scan multi-view analysis showing cross-section, top-down slice, and 3D reconstruction of cracked plastic part with defect indicators

Representative Cases

A selection from our 198+ plastic failure litigation cases.

Consumer  Multiple States 

China Step Stool — Contaminated Polypropylene

Polypropylene (PP) with Contamination

Folding step stool should have been pure PP. SEM coupled with EDS revealed foreign particles and molding voids embedded in the material. Chemical analysis identified the contamination from recycled resin weakened the material's strength, causing catastrophic failure under normal use.

Consumer  Multiple States 

Exercise Balls — Copper Pigment Degradation of Ball Material

PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride)

Burst-resistant exercise balls were manufactured in 5 colors. Green and blue balls exploded under athletes lifting weights, causing compound arm fractures. Videos were collected during laboratory burst tests of the five different colored balls. The yellow, black, and brown balls deflated slowly under 400 pounds of weight when punctured while the blue and green balls both violently exploded when punctured. The videos were shown at settlement discussions — Defense immediately settled.

Construction  Multiple States 

CPVC Fire Sprinkler — Garden Hose Contamination

CPVC (Chlorinated PVC)

Pipe leaks in fire sprinkler system. Cracks initiated inside pipe from environmental stress cracking (ESC). FTIR identified di-t-butylterephthalate (DtBT) — a chemical from the garden hose used to fill the system. Recommended total system replacement.

Attorney's Guide

Proving Product Defects

Practical guidance for attorneys handling plastic product liability cases.

 Advanced Forensic Capabilities

Laboratory instrumentation that provides court-ready evidence for construction defect litigation.

peg_icon_2
SEM & Fractography

High magnification reveals fracture surface detail not visible optically. EDS measures the elemental composition of defect particles. The 'gold standard' for proving crack initiation at a specific defect site.

peg_icon_15
FTIR Spectroscopy

Every chemical has a unique FTIR 'fingerprint.' Our computer chemical fingerprint library identifies chemicals and commercial products from their spectral signature. FTIR unmasks material substitution, off-spec resins, and contaminants that caused a failure.

peg_icon_21
FEA (Finite Element Analysis)

FEA proves whether a product's design distributes stresses or concentrates them at failure-prone locations. Dynamic FEA simulates repetitive cyclical stress to expose fatigue-prone weak points.

peg_icon_18
CT Scanning

Non-destructive. Reveals internal voids, knit lines, contamination, and manufacturing defects invisible from outside the part. CT scanning is the first step in most product investigations.

Engineering & Design Services

Five core capabilities — from simulation to production-floor optimization.

Plaintiff-Side Product Liability Support
  • Preliminary non-destructive assessment to determine the most likely cause of failure

  • Helps attorney decide which parties to put on notice as defendants

  • Provides expert analysis to prepare the complaint for court filing

  • Can estimate cost of remediation and damages for settlement positioning

  • CT-first approach preserves evidence while revealing defects immediately to determine which parties to put on notice.

Defense-Side Product Liability Support
  • Determines cause of failure so defendant can identify the responsible party

  • If root cause is a manufacturing defect or improper operation/maintenance, the defendant may be released from liability

  • Expert identifies contributory negligence, product misuse, or third-party modifications

  • Forensic analysis differentiates between product defect and user error

  • Participation in joint testing ensures proper protocols and fair representation
Insurance Subrogation & Claims Support
  • Neutral, science-based determination of which party is responsible for the failure

  • Insurance company recovers remediation costs from the responsible party through subrogation

  • Impartial methodology ensures findings withstand scrutiny from all sides

  • Comprehensive reporting supports claims evaluation and settlement decisions

  • Expert testimony available for arbitration, mediation, settlement discussions, and litigation, if needed

peg_icon_22

Visual Evidence That Wins Cases

Compelling demonstrations and microscopic imagery that persuade juries, mediators, and opposing counsel.

"A picture is worth a thousand words is more true than ever in legal matters. Juries, mediation judges, and opposing attorneys are greatly affected by videos, photographs, and demonstrations."

 

Dramatic Demonstrations

Taking a piece of plastic and showing it can be bent in half without breaking, then applying a chemical and demonstrating it shatters like glass — dramatic and convincing!

Plastic product fracture along knit line revealing manufacturing defect in forensic analysis

 

Fractography Maps

A microscope image showing thumbnail features typical of ESC failure, closely spaced parallel striations typical of fatigue, or a bubble from which a crack developed — very obvious and convincing. A single SEM fractography map can be more persuasive than a 50-page expert report.

SEM micrograph showing glass fiber orientation parallel to fracture at product knit line defect

Product Liability FAQ

Common questions from attorneys handling plastic product liability cases.

Request a Product Liability Case Evaluation

Tell us about your product liability case. Our experts typically respond within 24 hours with an initial assessment of the product failure and recommend a forensic approach.

24-Hour Response
Initial case assessment within one business day.

Prefer to Call?
+1 (989) 281-4465